Journal directory listing - Volume 63 (2018) - Journal of NTNU【63(1)】March

“Qingshang Sandiao”: Establishing the Paradigm of Literary Criticism in Modern China Author: Yingying Sun (School of Chinese, The University of Hong Kong, Lecturer)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 63, No. 1
Date:March 2018

In 1933, a discussion related to “Qingshang Sandiao” (the three tones of Qingshang) was published in a university journal (Tsinghua University Weekly). Two famous scholars were involved in this debate, namely Huang Jie (1873-1935) and Zhu Ziqing (1898-1948). Their discussion on “Qingshang Sandiao” was first analyzed by Liang Qichao (1873-1929) in an unpublished manuscript. Huang Jie did not agree with Liang’s viewpoint, and Zhu supported Liang’s argument by employing historical evidence. This discussion was completed by Huang’s reply, which did not answer Zhu’s core doubt on the division of “Xianghe Diao” and “Qingshang Diao.” Huang believed that studies on “Yuefu” poetry should concern its content and political impact on society. However, Zhu focused on the musicality and literary nature of “Yuefu” poetry. The current study explored the evidence, arguments, and influences of both parties in this discussion, concluding that the discussion in 1933 indicated a conflict between various paradigms of literary criticism in modern China.

Keywords:literary Criticism, Zhu ziqing (1898-1948), Qingshang Sandiao, Huang Jie (1873-1935), Yuefu poetry studies

《Full Text》

  1. 明•胡應麟,《詩藪》(上海市:上海古籍出版社,1979)。
  2. 清•朱乾(編),興膳宏解說,《樂府正義》(京都市:同朋舍,1980)。
  3. 孔德,〈漢短簫鐃歌十八曲考釋〉,《東方雜誌》,23卷9期(1926),頁75-91。
  4. 心海,〈流芳遺臭:詩人黃晦聞〉,《禮拜六》,587期(1935),頁5。
  5. 王禮錫,〈中國詩史(陸侃如、馮沅君合著)〉,《讀書雜誌》,1卷6期(1931),頁1-2。
» More
APA FormatSun, Y. (2018). “Qingshang sandiao”: Establishing the paradigm of literary criticism in modern China. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University, 63(1), 21-40.
Chicago FormatSun, ​Yingying. “Qingshang Sandiao”: Establishing the Paradigm of Literary Criticism in Modern China.” Journal of National Taiwan Normal University 63, no. 1 (2018): 21-40.